Ravi Shankar Prasad questions Congress' stand on Ram Janmbhoomi case

Adjust Comment Print

"Who he represents in court is Kapil Sibal's personal matter", Congress spokesperson Randeep Surjewala had said.

The first hearing was set a day before the 25th anniversary of the demolition of medieval-era mosque, Babri Masjid. The chairman of the body, Zufar Ahmed Farooqui said Sibal wasn't the board's lawyer and that Mehboob himself was not a member of the board, "but an individual party to the matter".

The Supreme Court had fixed the next hearing for the long-standing matter for February 8, 2018. "You want to keep the issue unresolved for political gain and losses in the elections?"

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the Sunni Waqf Board, had said in the Supreme Court on Wednesday that the appeals in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case be heard in July 2019 after the completion of the next Lok Sabha polls as the atmosphere at present was not conducive for the proceedings.

Addressing the media in Ahmedabad, Shah said Rahul was visiting temples in Gujarat, while on the other hand Congress leader Kapil Sibbal wanted to delay the Ram Janmbhoomi case. "Everybody said that if we take a stand against it, we will face a backlash in the UP elections, but we took a stand and the Supreme Court asked us to form a law in six months", he said.

Читайте также: Sam Smith Declares Allegiance in Kim vs. Taylor Feud

Meanwhile, today, a Delhi court will deliver its verdict in connection with the terrorist attack on the makeshift Ram Temple in Ayodhya in 2005.

PM Modi had earlier congratulated the Sunni Waqf Board for dissociating themselves from Sibal's statement in connection with the matter.

The Hindus, however, claim that a Ram temple that originally stood there was demolished to construct the mosque. Are these thoughts of delaying the hearing for elections that of the Waqf Board?

Union Law Minister Ravishankar Prasad said Kapil Sibal gave an irresponsible statement in the Supreme Court yesterday.He said Kapil Sibal must not forget that he has been the former law minister of the country.and he should give his arguments responsibly in sensitive cases. "It doesn't behove the status of a Prime Minister", Sibal said.

Board member Haji Mehboob said Sibal argued the case in the apex court as a Congress leader and not on behalf of the board.

При любом использовании материалов сайта и дочерних проектов, гиперссылка на обязательна.
«» 2007 - 2017 Copyright.
Автоматизированное извлечение информации сайта запрещено.

Код для вставки в блог